Published in KUNST.EE 2014/3 Marian Kivila analyses Anonymous Boh’s (or Al Paldrok’s) solo exhibition “10 COMMANDMENTS”.
Performance art, its documentation, and the subsequent reception, use and definitions of this documentation has fascinated many art critics and historians. Performances, as ephemeral works of art, are meant to vanish from the very beginning as soon as they are conceived by the artist. The desire to preserve something impermanent often raises questions like what is the goal of documenting it, is it really necessary and whether the documentation should be considered purely as a means for documenting living art or as works of art in their own right.
As we know from art history, there are many performance artists who avoid documenting their work and also forbid their audience from doing so in any way. Their art is something rare, only meant for a small number of random viewers, and afterwards it only lives on as a fading memory in the minds of those who happened to have seen it. It seems to make sense (in a morbidly romantic way) that this is how an ephemeral work of art is born and how it dies.
Amelia Jones, a performance art theorist, has suggested that the documentation (e.g. photographs) acts as a supplement to the performance. She sees the relationship between performance and photographic documentation as co-dependent and symbiotic. Photography needs events to exist and events need photography to prove they once existed. Photography is like a key to a lost time.
There is a whole array of artists who fanatically document their performances and, from various angles, try to analyse the co-dependent relationship that Jones has described. Anonymous Boh is the kind of artist whose creative processes involving one single work of art might never be finished. He tries to find new ways to recontextualise the documentation of completed performances – sometimes as supplements, other times as independent pieces replenished with new meanings. Boh’s earlier shows have displayed photographic documentation in the way they were taken, or created settings that present reproductions of performances.
The exhibition “10 COMMANDMENTS” is based on performances by Non Grata, held in various parts of the world, and the documentation that has taken on new meanings. The scenes from past performances are placed in a new context and are reconceptualised as the time, space and audience change. That is, according to what the artist wants to say to the world.
The first commandment in the series suggests that the instructions of the former professor of Academia Non Grata are probably directed at artists to help them think independently, believe in themselves, find their talent and manage their life. If applied to a larger segment of society, the commandment “Don’t ever get employed!” would be catastrophic and would most likely lead to the destruction of that society. The commandment “Don’t consume, DIY!” refers to the potential for restructuring society according to anarchist principles – based on a natural economy, the currently prevalent wage labour would no longer be necessary.
The somewhat utopian commandments, that definitely also have a certain amount of truth in them, are a critique of artists that do not know how to use their talent. An artist working in a bar or slaving away in an ad agency has chosen the easy way out, they also believe that it is impossible to make a living as an artist. So, making this belief into a daily affirmation, they also destroy their chances of having a successful career in art.
We probably all know artists who are so busy with their day jobs that they no longer have the time to challenge the discourses of the art world, to start revolutions and keep their talent shining bright. For them, art seems to have become a mere hobby. Then again, I also know artists who successfully sell their works and because of that have acquired the rather negative label of “commercial artist”. So, Boh points to the paradox of being an artist and the need to be constantly searching for the right balance in every tiny move and thought. Boh also refers to the fact that manifests are rarely written anymore and people often conform, which he, as quite a successful and productive artist, clearly does not approve of.
As the next step we could of course muse on what an artist should be like and which expectations they should fulfil in order to be called an artist. For Boh, an artist is someone superhuman: a prophet (the commandment “If you know the truth, share it with everyone!”), an ascetic (the commandment “Escape your comfort zone!”), a philosopher (the commandment “Doubt everything!”), an extraverted and active socialiser (the commandment “Stay connected”) and an enthusiast (the commandment “Don’t complain, bring the change!), all in one person.
Boh wants the artist to be a rebel, and the artwork a loud message. Nevertheless, it seems that the best part of the exhibition is not the dominating imperatives, but the fascinating way he has presented the documentation of the performances.
I would also add a commandment for artists: “Don’t make art that screams in your face, take an enigmatic approach!” Our senses are ruined due to the over consumption of conceptual art and so we probably enjoy art more if it offers more than one possibility of interpretation and there is something to think about. There are shows that stay with you for days before you reach a cathartic understanding. Yet it is true that there have not been many exhibitions like this lately and I can agree with Boh’s criticism.
I was actually amazed by the softer side of Boh, his figurative critique. The maquette-installation “Evolution” (2014) that had lined up tin soldiers, dinosaurs and human figures according to size, finely and accurately captured the idea of escaping the comfort zone and conforming to the ideals of the welfare society.
Marian Kivila is a freelance art critic and the marketing manager at the Pärnu Museum.
Yesterday Non Grata represented best of Estonian printmaking, including Peeter Allik, Anonymous Boh, Raul Meel, Tõnis Laanemaa, Leonhard Lapin, Taje Tross and Toomas Kuusing at Cannonball Prints event Prints Gone Wild in New York City!
Non Grata presents the best Estonian Print Collection in New York – Anonymous Boh, Peeter Allik, Taje Tross, Toomas Kuusing, Leonhard Lapin, Raul Meel and Tõnis Laanemaa
Friday, Nov 7th for the latest instalment of a New York City Print Week tradition!
Cannonball Press proudly presents:
PRINTS GONE WILD 2014!
The eighth-ever annual printacular mega-hairy Brooklyn affordable print fair!
THE ORIGINAL 50 bucks and under American print fair.
WHEN: ONE NIGHT ONLY!
FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7TH, 2014. 6pm – 1am.
WHERE:
LITTLEFIELD NYC
622 Degraw St., Gowanus, Brooklyn, NY 11217
btwn. 3rd and 4th Aves.
Take the 2, 3, 4, 5, B, D, N, or Q to Atlantic Terminal or the R train to Union St.
directions: www.littlefieldnyc.com/
Free admission. 21 and over only.
FEATURING:
Drive By Press Brooklyn, NY
Florence Gidez Brooklyn, NY
Bikini Press International Minneapolis, MN
Sean Star Wars Laurel, MS
Non Grata Collective Parnu, Estonia
Raking Light Projects Colorado
Evil Prints St. Louis, MO
Deerjerk and Haypeep West Virginia
Church of Type Los Angeles, CA
Justseeds Brooklyn, NY
The Amazing Hancock Bros. Austin, TX
Cannonball Press Brooklyn, NY
Brooklyn’s own legendary Cannonball Press has again assembled an extraordinary menagerie of graphic artists under one roof who will be present displaying and selling their prints for $50 or less for one night only at LITTLEFIELD NYC.
As part of New York Fine Art Print Week, organized by the International Fine Print Dealers Association in conjunction with the Annual IFPDA Pint Fair, long-time champion of the affordable art cause Cannonball Press has brought together these great artists so that New York can have a chance to see first-hand the incredible resurgence in affordable fine art printing that is happening across the country.
Come join us for live printing, beer, music, and a GIANT dogpile of awesome cheap prints!!!
Estonian artists are into some weird shit
Published in aweh.tv By Dann Gaymer on 3/9/12
As a key lynch pin of the NON GRATA performance group, Estonian artist Anonymous Boh has been creating and reimagining for the past two decades. With performance, art tours and lectures, across Asia, Europe and the Americas, NON GRATA has breathed a fresh life in performance art, and into the wider discourse of what art should be and what it should do. As a teacher of the Academia Non Grata program Anonymous Boh helped propagate a different approach to freeing the minds of young artists, in sharp contrast to the rigid and formulaic teaching methods of so many European schools. Today this mission continues albeit on a wider scale, when NON GRATA arrive in a foreign city, breezing in like a pirate nation and calling on a network of sleeping participants to come out and create something for the sake of creation, not to give answers but to pose questions.
While Anonymous Boh’s artist CV reads like an adventure novel, he has done an excellent job of doing exactly what his name suggests and removing himself from the work, along with the rest of NON GRATA. While he has performed at Seoul’s KEAF festival before this year’s performance will be worth witnessing, nay, participating in, because there is no way of telling what it will entail. Structured chaos will reign.
AWEH sat down with the man with barely a name to find out about the art environment of Estonia as of recent, where he feels NO GRATA’s mission is at, and what challenges the art world still needs to address.
AWEH: Who are you and what do you do?
Anonymous: I am Anonymous Boh from NON GRATA group. NON GRATA is an international performance group from Estonia with floating membership. In NON GRATA there has been more than 500 members during last fifteen years from all over the world. The main characteristics is anonymity in group work, ignorance of the local art world, and mass media. The group has performed in Asia, Europe, South and North America with street actions, chaotic space and context specific performances, and long lasting ghetto marathons.
AWEH: How did you become interested in art and begin to follow it as a profession?
Anonymous: I have been in art all my life since I was six and just step by step it is now full time profession.
AWEH: How is the art scene in Estonia?
Anonymous: The art scene is quite active if we compare that only 1 million people live in Estonia — it is the smallest nation in the mainland in world with their own state, written language, and national TV.
AWEH: Is it possible for artists to support themselves through non-commercial ventures?
Anonymous: Theoretically of course, everything is possible, practically I am not so sure.
AWEH: What inspired NON GRATA at its inception as a school?
Anonymous: Academia Non Grata was founded after the Soviet Union collapsed. The fact that we witnessed the collapse of a whole Soviet system gave a unique angle of approach that was unprecedented in the West. At first [early 1990s] there were many cultural figures in the Estonian Parliament. Had they kept the cultural level and the other things together, had they taken the responsibility that used to belong to the church and during the Soviet times to the state, so that there were not just the laws of the jungle, but various structures, then there might have formed a common understanding of what it really is we’re doing. A country from which Tony Blair could have learnt a lesson about the third route, not a country with a Prime Minister being a Thatcher disciple.
In the middle of ‘90s results of this direction was clear — Estonia was typical early capitalistic society, where everything was calculated by money only. The mental discussion about what a person could do during the period between birth and death and how the state could support him was ended. What it was worth being born for? With what kind of people one wants to spend one’s life? Self-censorship of the people, including the intellectuals, has reached unbelievable dimensions. Everything that is, is good. It is considered frantically shameful to think about what could be: maybe it makes me a loser? Maybe a dreamer?
The body of artists (intellectuals) has ceased to act according to their true nature and ideals, the prevalent trends are accepted as inevitable and frenzied attempts are made to adjust to them. The art circle as a whole is no longer interested in dealing with the essential, most of the energy in the pedagogical institutions of art is wasted on formal feeding of the structure and on making formal moves. It is surprising how quickly Estonian ‘intellectuals’ were settled as a part in the machinery in the name of a little oiling.
Same problems were then in art education. The managements of the leading institutions of art education admitted that their hands are tied, because rooting of ‘unsolicited’ standards is the only way to be integrated into the greater system and avoid the terrifying status of “being left out”, as they say. I would like to know who has proclaimed this practice of absolute pragmatics to be a cognitive inevitability that is faithfully followed by the various fields of institutions of higher education and their specialists.
AWEH: What kind of methods did you employ to ensure that a student of NON GRATA wasn’t “just a good designer of bottle labels.”
Anonymous: An artist has to attempt to improve the world. The aim of the Academia Non Grata was and still is to create a mental atmosphere where people felt free to ask themselves and others: what is it that I really think, what is it that I really want? Many of our teaching methods that seem strange to the bystander, serve the very purpose of teaching a person to really step into the game. At the same time, it is still an art school. The language we use is figurative. So I cannot be blamed for not doing anything if I don’t like it. I am doing it, but with my own tools. It is not enough if an artist is just a good designer of bottle labels. Similarly it is not enough if a person is a good and successful critic, scientist or who ever. What we propagate is actually very simple — that a person should be able to sincerely look into the face of someone else and to smile without any pretence, arrogance or bootlicking. I do not think it comes naturally but rather that it needs to be learnt, like any other thing.
AWEH:Since the Academia NON GRATA educational program in Pärnu ended how has your involvement continued with NON GRATA?
Anonymous: It really did not end, we just switched to another form. After six or seven years of being a primary school of the free arts, it has ceased to be this kind of educational institution — the state-controlled higher educational system has taken over the ANG interdisciplinary courses of the arts. Accordingly, the mission of the ANG is therefore completed. Its main purpose has never been a typical art school, but it has always tried to be a place of alternative solutions, which would be developed and put into practice. The educational system of the EU as a whole has changed into an establishment so controlled, that it takes all the power, time, and resources of the students, making them deal with formalities, that have nothing to do with creative work. All the burocratic rituals take so much time, that not much energy would be left for the main purpuses. This kind of choice is made in full awareness, very well knowing that it would restrain the aftergrowth, but there are minuses that are much worse. The main object of the ANG has never been worrying about the aftergrowth; it has simply been an additional bonus in our work as healers of the society.
The ANG has switched into another system, which may be called postgraduate atelier-system, as well as the programs of lectures, “Academia on the Wheels”. The latter is meant to use institutional parasite-piracy,using the other existing material-technical bases in order to disseminate our ideas and to put them into practice.
Like from the beginning I am still active on a frameless territory where an art object has ceased to exist as a physical piece. The space has many dimensions upon which the activity has been built. Curating the performance group NON GRATA actually means creating a certain kind of school which can be characterized by features as structured chaos, performances in arbitrary environments and interiors. By obtaining its reputation as an alternative we swooped onto the global art landscape — performances, art tours organized in tens of cities across Europe, Asia, and America.
AWEH:You’ve told us about how NON GRATA’s mission was to create a break away from the mainstream in Estonia, and make art and performance substantial and meaningful again. On both a local and global level how successful has this mission been? Do you feel there is more work to be done?
Anonymous: The artists have become either the ones who satisfy society’s certain aesthetic needs, small scale entrepreneurs producing pretty things, or society’s fools officially labelled as the opponent.The global performance art is sinking in its own blood, every now and then. And NG is then asked to come and rescue it. It is as if a nomadic tribe of artists steps by and the reality is being altered. Like the story of NG written by Finns where they talk about the liberators from the incest and the orphic hole…
There is a wild creative power wave all over the world and our underground network connects it together. The universe is an experimental space and art is a creational process in a perpetual move.
AWEH:The fact that you perform anonymously seems profound when so much of art today seems tied with “getting yourself out there”. Art school graduates can seem more concerned with their public image as opposed to their creative output, but do you think this is just a fool’s errand, that will ultimately conclude in being overlooked in art history?
Anonymous: What is fame nowadays? The media is not interested in the essence of things but rather in a special format. It is very easy to produce an item that looks like art nowadays. It was a great event when Vermeer made a picture, thousands of people came to see it. Today a couple of million pictures are being produced every second in our computers and TV sets. The picture itself interests no one. People barely know the works of famous contemporary artists. It is actually possible to become famous without making any pictures, by just declaring that one makes pictures.
Apart from Andy Warhol in the art world, there are no commonly recognized megastars who would be known to any Tom, Dick and Harry. In the present condition that, by the creation of the Internet, the information society has brought about, the art world, as an institution, has not been able to address its issues nor establish its own paradigms.
I consider it an ill-service to the youth if you simply make them promote themselves and run around in circles, when a few decades have passed the person is still completely empty. The art world takes what interests it at the moment, and then throws it aside again, taking a new interesting thing. What does the person do then if one has based it all on the art world? There are many who cry: “Look what they’re doing to me, I’m no longer popular…”
If you evolve as a human being you can do anything at any time. You can become a braze welder for that matter, because you’re in charge of the process.
AWEH: You recently did a performance of Force Majeure in Chicago, where we heard a car suffered a fair amount of abuse. What is the outline for your performance during KEAF?
Anonymous: We do not know yet, only that the theme of KEAF this year is “Wheel“. Our performances are mostly context and location specific. We make no plans prior to our arrival to the place and we do not provide generally pre-required work descriptions. Everything is being decided on the spot, where we are going to perform or the performance space is being chosen due to the inspiration drawn from the actual place. Local cultural background, history, stereotypes, nature, people, politics, personal experiences are all being involved and blended together. They’ll form a mini model of a concrete society and, with its different levels, it starts to serve as a background for a concrete idea or it’ll behave as a piece of art work in itself.
AWEH:What are your overall expectations of this trip to Korea?
Anonymous: Creative environment, great people, talented artists, deep dicussions and something you never can expect.
AWEH:Any final words of love or hate to share?
Anonymous: I love Korea!
Published in Incident Magazine
Watching Non Grata perform and performing as Non Grata are two completely different experiences, a difference that can be best described as watching a tornado carve out its path from a distance, and being thrashed around in the eye of the cyclone: what looks like organized chaos, is just, well, chaos.
Non Grata, which is filled with a rotating group of artists of many backgrounds from around the world, gains a sort of reputation, a persona given by the crowd before you take center stage. You gain the reputation of being wild and dangerous, you put on that mask, and you always feel like you live up to the crowd’s expectations. At times you want to get lost in the moment of performing in a smoke hazed room, you become focused and nearsighted in vision, an hour can go by in a minute—this while also having to always look over your shoulder in case you run into another performer or an errant flame. After the adrenaline wears off and the spectacle recedes, the debris from the performance fills up the once clean gallery space. “Was that a good performance?,” you ask yourself. “What were the other performers doing? What happened?” Well, these things happen.
Non Grata is back in the United States after an extended tour that included Athens, Latvia, Beijing, and South Korea; the collective will be holding at month long stay in November at Grace Exhibition Space that will include curated shows, as well as a performance workshop on the 19th and 20th that explores how to perform like a child of the Storm Generation.
Al Paldrok, a founding member of Non Grata, answered a few questions through email about the workshop, as well as some his ideas, methods and experiences in teaching performance and public interventions.
– David LaGaccia
Interviewer
For the workshop, how have you designed the workshop based on your previous experiences in performance and public intervention?
Paldrok
My performance workshops are designed like the Academia Non Grata curriculum and educational philosophy – it is based on the method to trigger a creative explosion in people and help them find their own individual expression suitable to their own mental and physical capacity. To release the wild side and connect into the intellectual and social context.
During the workshop, participants can bring their ideas strait to the society and express themselves how they want – politically, socially, existentially. If you have something important to say – Do it, just do it. Workshop participants will help each other to make it happen – in street context there is lot of details what you have to take care off – starting from just keeping you personal belongings safe during the action, to blocking police and security when you escape.
This summer we made workshop in Athens what ended up with political protest actions in front of the Greece parliament and there this practice was in use in full script.
Conception, Chile with local participants we cached the president of the country with his crowd on the street and used them in performance, creating situation where the border between art and life disappeared.
Interviewer
What have you felt works, or doesn’t work on understanding and making performance?
Paldrok
There are no bad performance ideas, but there are thousands of lousy ways of realizing them. First of all you have to have guts and when you know the truth, you have to spread it around, loud and wide. In workshop you can make things what you never are able to make alone.
Interviewer
Were the designed activities informed from personal methods that you have found beneficial for making good performance, or are you exploring new methods in the creation of performances and public interventions?
Paldrok
An artist’s own body can be a performance instrument, however, today its importance gradually decreases – there are robots, electronic and mechanical devices, automobiles, crowds of people – that all can be remotely directed. One’s own body is definitely the most available means. One can direct a performance totally separate from one’s body, using only one’s brain. To create a non-carnal space, a virtual performance or global catastrophe where performative activities start functioning on their own, disconnected from body. A brain is still a material part of one’s body, a thought originating from there is already a compromise between an idea and materialized reality. The real world is, as we all know, imperfect. Within the compromise between the spiritual and real, the carnal side finally determines, as it acts as a filter or stirrer of the channelized idea. Filters and stirrers are widely used in all kinds of technical activities precisely as the factors that distort the original signals and raise the quality. Carnal filter in co-operation with the surrounding real absurd theatre at its best will result is a creation of a reality shift which, in turn, will bring about a new mental dimension that will, on the meta-level, initiate new processes. Therefore, the initial idea being thrown into the mundane reality is rather in a secondary role, it is more of a trigger.
Interviewer
Can you “teach” someone how to make performance? or is it a manner of learning by doing?
Paldrok
First of all – what is performance? Art is a deeply personal tool and really what teachers can do is give practical advises based on earlier experiences and encourage participants to contribute fully and not to be afraid of anything.
Interviewer
You have done many performance and interventions in the street and in a crowd. Does the space where you teach your methods affect the quality how performers learn new methods? What are the benefits of learning to perform inside a gallery, and what are the benefits of learning to perform outside on the street? Does each space have new things to learn from?
Paldrok
A vast majority of performances are interactive and in whatever crazy situations one can expect anything: from verbal disturbances to direct physical attack by the audience, unexpected spatial configurations, interference by the police, fire brigade, ambulance etc. One of the most important characteristic features of a performance artist is the ability to control the performative process. To be ready to improvise and guide the processes in an unexpected situations.
Gallery performances are safe versions, at least in western world everything is allowed there.
I use the performance medium, because it is very hard to say what it is exactly. This is what I like most about it and also it’s what makes it interesting for people, unexpected results, you never know what you are going to get, you see something, but you do not know what it is (It is the opposite of entertainment – there, you get what you expect). When you know it is politics, you turn away, it’s boring, when it is protest action, theatre, circus, protest to save nature, gender, animals, humanity, it’s the same thing. In a museum context everybody knows that you get performance art there – booooring! It takes all the layers away from the act and leaves just one – contemporary art. For that reason I like it when in performance art circles they say, that Non Grata is not real Performance Art.
I think it is really important to take back public place as platform of changing society.
It is not fighting against the system but approving of the system. We are all living in this structure and our goal is to make it a better place. The world is now so big, so complicated a structure that it is beyond our human understanding. I truly believe that all these cursed politicians and people in financial positions – they are not evil in their hearts, I think they make the best with what their human resources allow. Unfortunately their intellectual capacity is just not enough. So creative forces have to take over this system, if they want to approve it. If we do not do it, then there is no point for us to whine.
28. VI–20. VII 2014 Tallinna Linnagalerii
Elav kunst, surnud kunstnik ( ilmunud KUNST.EE 2014/3)
Marian Kivila analüüsib Anonymous Boh’i (ehk Al Paldroki) isiknäitust “10 KÄSKU”. Performance’ikunst, selle dokumentatsioon ning dokumentatsioonide käsitlus, kasutus ja defineerimisviis on pakkunud huvi paljudele kunstiteadlastele. Performance kui efemeerne teos on juba kunstniku kavatsuste eos hukule määratud. Püüd säilitada säilimatut tekitab sageli küsimusi, mis eesmärgil on seda üldse vaja teha ning kas dokumenti tulekski võtta kui elusat kunsti dokumenteeriva vahendina või hoopis omaette kunstiteosena?
Ajalugu tunneb tervet rida tegevuskunstnikke, kes on vältinud oma teoste talletamist, keelanud publikul teost pildistada või seda muul moel jäädvustada. Nende kunst on haruldus, mis on mõeldud üksikutele juhuslikele silmapaaridele, elamaks edasi kõigest tuhmuva mälestusena kellegi kohalolija teadvuses. Tundub loogiline (ja isegi morbiidselt romantiline), et ühe õige efemeerse kunstiteose sünd ja surm sellistel alustel toimibki. Performance’ikunsti teoreetik Amelia Jones on käinud välja idee, mille kohaselt dokumentatsioon (näiteks foto) on performance’ile nö täienduseks. Tema teooria performance’i ja dokumenteeriva foto suhtest põhineb nende kahe sümbioosil ja sõltuvussuhtel. Foto vajab sündmust, et eksisteerida ning sündmus vajab fotot, et tõestada oma kunagist eksistentsi. Foto on võti, mis avab kadunud reaalsust. On ka terve rida kunstnikke, kes fanaatiliselt oma aktsioone dokumenteerivad ning püüavad Jones’i kirjeldatud sõltuvussuhet mitmel erineval viisil lahti mõtestada. Anonymous Boh on kunstnik, kelle jaoks loomeprotsess ühe teose ümber võib kesta lõputult. Nii otsib ta viise, kuidas dokument kord kadunud teose täiendusena konteksti tagasi asetada, kord aga just sellest välja rebida ning uute tähendustega küllastada. Bohi varasemad näitused on esitanud dokumenteerivaid fotosid – nii, nagu nad on – või tekitanud hoopis olustikke, milles lavastus imiteerib performance’it.
Näitus “10 KÄSKU” toetub aastate jooksul maailma eri paigus teostatud Non Grata performance’itele, mille dokumentatsioonid on vahetanud sõnumit. Stseenid teostatud performance’itest leiavad uue konteksti ja kontseptsiooni vastavalt ajale, ruumile ja publikule. Ehk siis vastavalt sellele, mida kunstnikul parasjagu maailmale öelda on.
Seeria esimene käsk reedab, et kunagise Academia Non Grata professori õpetussõnad on tõenäoliselt suunatud loomeinimestele ning jagavad kunstnikele näpunäiteid, kuidas iseseisva mõtlemise, eneseusu ja talendi abil elus hakkama saada. Käsk “Ära kunagi mine tööle!” toimiks laiema kodanikkonna seas hukatuslikult ja viiks suure tõenäosusega ühiskonna hävinguni. Käsk
“Ära tarbi, tee ise!” viitab samas võimalusele korraldada ühiskond anarhistlikult ümber taas naturaalmajandusel toimivaks süsteemiks, kus palgatöö praeguses tähenduses ei olekski vajalik. Kohati utoopiana kõlavad käsud, milles on kindlasti oma terake tõtt, on suunatud kriitikana kunstnike pihta, kes ei oska oma andega midagi peale hakata. Baaris teenindajana või reklaamifirmas trükiettevalmistajana orjav kunstnik on valinud lihtsama vastupanu tee, sisendades sealjuures endale uskumust, et ainuüksi kunstiga ei ole võimalik ära elada. Oma uskumust igapäevaselt tunnistades muudetakse oma võimalused edukaks karjääriks üsna nullilähedaseks. Meist ilmselt igaüks teab tervet hulka kunstnikke, kellel pole enam töö kõrvalt aega kunstimaailma diskursuseid murda, revolutsiooni teha ja andeka talendina särada. Kunst oleks justkui muutunud hobitegevuseks. Teisalt, tean ka kunstnikke, kes suudavad oma töid edukalt müüa ning on läbi selle omandanud üsna negatiivse maine kommertskunstnikena. Seega toob Boh välja kunstnikuks olemise paradoksi ning vajaduse leida ja otsida pidevat tasakaalu oma igas argises liigutuses ja mõttekäigus. Boh viitab perfektsionistlikult manifestide kadumisele ning mugavale kohandumisele ümbritsevaga, mida ta ilmselgelt ise keskmisest edukama ja produktiivsema kunstnikuna hukka mõistab.
Jätkuks võib muidugi filosofeerida selle üle, kes on üldse kunstnik ja millistele eeldustele peaks ta vastama, et oma ameti vääriline olla. Bohi jaoks on kunstnik midagi üliinimlikku: prohvet (käsk “Kui sa tead tõde, jaga seda kõigiga!”), askeet (käsk “Põgene oma mugavustsoonist!”), filosoof (käsk “Kahtle kõiges!”), ekstravertne ja aktiivne sotsialiseeruja (käsk “Ole ühenduses!”) ja entusiast (käsk “Ära vingu, vaid muuda!”) ühes isikus. Boh rõhub kunstnikule kui mässajale ja teosele kui karjuvale sõnumikandjale. Siiski tundub, et parim osa näitusest ei ole mitte domineeriv käskivas kõneviisis tekst, vaid just huvitav performance’idokumendi käsitlus. Lisaksin kunstnikele omalt poolt veel ühe käsu: “Ära tee kunsti, mis karjub näkku, vaid kunsti, mis läheneb mõistatuslikult!” Kontseptuaalse kunsti ületarbimisest ruineeritud meeltele mõjub tõenäoliselt iga kunstiteos seda nauditavamalt, mida rohkem suudab teos pakkuda erinevaid tõlgendusviise ning ajutööd. Mõni näitus suudab mitmeid päevi kummitada, enne kui saabub katarsislik arusaamine. Tõsi küll, viimasel ajal on selliseid näituseid vähem ja Bohi kriitikaga võib üldjoontes nõus olla. Mind rabas näitusel Bohi soft’im pool ehk kujundlik kriitika. Makettinstallatsioon “Evolutsioon” (2014) suuruselt kahanevatest tinasõduritest, dinosaurustest ja inimestest võttis sama idee mugavustsooni põgenemisest ning heaoluühiskonnaga kohandumisest väga tabavalt ja peenelt kokku.
Marian Kivila on vabakutseline kunstikriitik, töötab Pärnu Muuseumi arendus ja turundusjuhina.